Change Management Skill
TOGAF ADM Phase H: Architecture Change Management
Purpose
Phase H ensures that the architecture remains relevant and responsive to business needs over time. It establishes processes to:
- Monitor the implemented architecture for required changes
- Assess change requests against architecture principles
- Manage the lifecycle of architecture changes
- Decide when to initiate a new ADM cycle
- Maintain architecture governance through evolution
When to Use This Skill
| Scenario |
Use Case |
| Post-Implementation |
Architecture deployed, entering steady-state operations |
| Change Request Received |
Business or technology change needs architectural assessment |
| Environmental Shift |
Market, regulatory, or technology landscape changes |
| Performance Gap |
Realized architecture not meeting expectations |
| Strategic Pivot |
Business strategy shift requiring architecture review |
| Periodic Review |
Scheduled architecture health assessment |
Key Concepts
Architecture Change Continuum
Changes exist on a spectrum from minor adjustments to major transformations:
┌─────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────┐
│ ARCHITECTURE CHANGE CONTINUUM │
├─────────────┬─────────────────┬──────────────────┬──────────────────┤
│ Simplification │ Incremental │ Re-Architecture │ Radical │
│ │ Change │ │ Change │
├─────────────┼─────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────┤
│ Minor config │ Component │ Domain rebuild │ Enterprise │
│ optimization │ enhancements │ or replacement │ transformation │
│ │ │ │ │
│ Local impact │ Bounded impact │ Domain impact │ Enterprise-wide │
│ │ │ │ │
│ Weeks │ Months │ Quarters │ Years │
├─────────────┼─────────────────┼──────────────────┼──────────────────┤
│ Phase H │ Phase H │ New ADM Cycle │ New ADM Cycle │
│ (internal) │ (governance) │ (partial) │ (full) │
└─────────────┴─────────────────┴──────────────────┴──────────────────┘
Change Drivers
| Category |
Examples |
| Business Drivers |
Strategy shifts, M&A, new markets, regulatory changes |
| Technology Drivers |
New capabilities, deprecations, security vulnerabilities |
| Operational Drivers |
Performance issues, operational challenges, cost pressure |
| External Drivers |
Market disruption, competitor actions, ecosystem changes |
Governance Levels
| Level |
Scope |
Authority |
Examples |
| Enterprise |
Cross-domain changes |
Architecture Board |
New integration patterns, shared services |
| Domain |
Single domain changes |
Domain Architect |
Component replacement, interface updates |
| Solution |
Project-level changes |
Solution Architect |
Implementation decisions, tactical fixes |
Key Deliverables
| Deliverable |
Description |
Audience |
| Architecture Change Request |
Formal proposal for architecture modification |
Governance body |
| Change Impact Assessment |
Analysis of change effects across architecture |
Decision makers |
| Change Decision |
Approved/rejected change with rationale |
Requestor, teams |
| Architecture Update |
Modified architecture artifacts |
All stakeholders |
| ADM Cycle Trigger |
Recommendation to initiate new cycle |
Architecture Board |
| Input |
Source |
Description |
| Change Request |
Business, IT, operations |
Proposed modification |
| Performance Data |
Monitoring systems |
Actual vs expected metrics |
| Compliance Assessments |
Phase G |
Identified gaps and issues |
| Technology Roadmaps |
Vendors, industry |
Future capabilities and EOL |
| Strategic Plans |
Business strategy |
Direction changes |
Outputs
| Output |
Destination |
Description |
| Updated Architecture |
Repository |
Modified artifacts |
| Architecture Updates |
Stakeholders |
Communication of changes |
| New ADM Work Request |
Architecture function |
Trigger for new cycle |
| Lessons Learned |
Knowledge base |
Process improvements |
Change Request Types
Type 1: Technology Refresh
Replacement of technology components at end-of-life or for improvement.
| Aspect |
Details |
| Trigger |
EOL notice, security advisory, capability gap |
| Scope |
Component or technology layer |
| Impact |
Typically bounded to specific systems |
| Process |
Phase H assessment, may trigger Phase D/E cycle |
Type 2: Strategic Change
Changes driven by business strategy or market forces.
| Aspect |
Details |
| Trigger |
Strategy shift, M&A, market entry/exit |
| Scope |
Multiple domains, potentially enterprise-wide |
| Impact |
Significant, cross-cutting |
| Process |
Usually triggers new ADM cycle from Phase A |
Type 3: Defect Resolution
Fixes to architecture gaps discovered in implementation.
| Aspect |
Details |
| Trigger |
Phase G findings, operational issues |
| Scope |
Specific architecture decisions |
| Impact |
Localized, corrective |
| Process |
Phase H internal, expedited |
Type 4: Enhancement
Improvements to realize additional value or capability.
| Aspect |
Details |
| Trigger |
Stakeholder request, opportunity identified |
| Scope |
Varies by enhancement scope |
| Impact |
Additive, extending current architecture |
| Process |
Phase H if minor, new cycle if major |
Decision Framework
Should This Change Trigger a New ADM Cycle?
flowchart TD
START[Change Request] --> Q1{Impacts enterprise<br/>principles or vision?}
Q1 -->|Yes| FULL[Full ADM Cycle<br/>from Phase A]
Q1 -->|No| Q2{Impacts multiple<br/>domains?}
Q2 -->|Yes| Q3{Fundamental<br/>restructuring?}
Q3 -->|Yes| PARTIAL_B[Partial Cycle<br/>from Phase B]
Q3 -->|No| PARTIAL_E[Partial Cycle<br/>from Phase E]
Q2 -->|No| Q4{Technology layer<br/>change only?}
Q4 -->|Yes| PARTIAL_D[Partial Cycle<br/>from Phase D]
Q4 -->|No| H[Handle in<br/>Phase H]
Change Classification Matrix
| Criteria |
Minor (H) |
Moderate (Partial) |
Major (Full) |
| Principle Impact |
None |
Limited |
Significant |
| Domain Scope |
Single |
2-3 Domains |
Enterprise |
| Stakeholder Impact |
Team |
Department |
Organization |
| Investment |
< $100K |
$100K-$1M |
> $1M |
| Duration |
< 3 months |
3-12 months |
> 12 months |
| Risk |
Low |
Medium |
High |
Architecture Monitoring
What to Monitor
| Category |
Metrics |
Threshold Examples |
| Conformance |
Deviation count, compliance score |
>10% drift triggers review |
| Performance |
Response times, availability, throughput |
Missed SLAs trigger assessment |
| Cost |
TCO, cloud spend, operational cost |
>20% variance triggers review |
| Technical Health |
Security vulnerabilities, tech debt score |
Critical CVEs immediate, debt >threshold triggers |
| Business Value |
Capability utilization, ROI metrics |
<60% utilization triggers review |
Monitoring Rhythm
| Activity |
Frequency |
Participants |
Output |
| Health Dashboard Review |
Weekly |
Architecture team |
Issue log |
| Architecture Health Report |
Monthly |
Domain architects |
Status report |
| Strategic Alignment Review |
Quarterly |
Architecture Board |
Priority changes |
| Comprehensive Assessment |
Annually |
Enterprise + business |
ADM cycle decision |
Integration with Other Phases
Phase G → Phase H
- Compliance issues become change requests
- Deviation patterns indicate architecture gaps
- Lessons learned inform changes
Phase H → Phase A
- Major changes trigger new vision work
- Architecture principles may need update
- Stakeholder concerns drive new initiatives
Phase H → Phase E
- Moderate changes may skip to opportunities analysis
- New transition architectures may be needed
- Project portfolio adjustments
| Tool |
Purpose |
| Change Request Register |
Track all requests through lifecycle |
| Architecture Health Dashboard |
Visualize monitoring metrics |
| Impact Assessment Template |
Standardize change analysis |
| Decision Log |
Record change decisions with rationale |
| Architecture Calendar |
Schedule reviews and assessments |
Invocation
Use this skill when:
- Processing architecture change requests
- Assessing impact of proposed modifications
- Deciding between Phase H resolution vs new cycle
- Conducting periodic architecture reviews
- Managing architecture evolution
Invoke with:
Use skill: togaf/change-management